Europe's Veto's Power

By Daniel Deudney, Hanns W. Maull
Download
Europe's Veto's Power

The rapid rise of the emerging powers in the past decade has shaken the international global order and raised many questions regarding the new forms and institutions of global governance. The composition of the United Nations Security Council, and in particular that of its permanent membership, is now widely seen as problematic. The permanent membership reflects more the world order of 1945 than of 2011. Europe — with France and the United Kingdom occupying two of the five permanent seats — is heavily over- represented, while such important rising powers as India and Brazil can at best hope to be elected members for two years at a time. At the same time, Europe is also under-represented in the Council, as other member states of the European Union, such as Germany, Italy, Spain, and Poland have to wait for their chance to serve as nonpermanent members. Nor is the European Union able to inject common positions into the deliberations of the Council.

Security Council reform has been on the agenda of the United Nations since the early 1990s, and despite repeated failures to secure a more representative Council membership, the issue will not go away. If reform does not happen soon, its declining legitimacy will effect the ability of the Council to assume its responsibilities at the apex of the United Nations.

This paper argues that France and the United Kingdom should jointly initiate an effort to re-form the Council, with the twin objectives to broaden the permanent membership and to consolidate the European role in the Council into one seat. This seat would by co-managed by France and the United Kingdom, but represent the common European position. This process of European consolidation would enable Europe to offer one of its two seats to one of the rising powers and thus challenge other member states of the United Nations to accept a thorough restructuring of the Council. Such an initiative would considerably strengthen the credibility and influence of France and the United Kingdom, and also that of the EU as a whole.

In parallel, the United States would commit itself to a “double veto” policy, casting a veto against a resolution in the Council only if it was seconded by at least one other veto power, challenging other permanent member states to follow suit. Through their coordinated initiatives, France, the United Kingdom, and the United States would thus promote reforms of international institutions towards more effective multilateralism both in the United Nations Security Council and within the European Union.

Authors
Theme